Hollywood Ending poster
7.4
Arcplot Score
Unverified

Hollywood Ending

2002112 minPG-13
Director: Woody Allen

Val Waxman is a film director who was once big in the 1970's and 1980's, but has now has been reduced to directing TV commercials. Finally, he gets an offer to make a big film. But, disaster strikes, when Val goes temporarily blind, due to paranoia. So, he and a few friends, try to cover up his disability, without the studio executives or the producers knowing that he is directing the film blind.

Revenue$14.6M
Budget$16.0M
Loss
-1.4M
-9%

The film disappointed at the box office against its mid-range budget of $16.0M, earning $14.6M globally (-9% loss).

Awards

1 nomination

Where to Watch
Amazon Prime VideoAmazon Prime Video with AdsAmazon VideoApple TVGoogle Play MoviesYouTubeFandango At Home

Plot Structure

Story beats plotted across runtime

Act ISetupAct IIConfrontationAct IIIResolutionWorldbuilding3Resistance5Premise8Opposition10Crisis12Synthesis14124679111315
Color Timeline
Color timeline
Sound Timeline
Sound timeline
Threshold
Section
Plot Point

Narrative Arc

Emotional journey through the story's key moments

+52-2
0m28m55m83m111m
Plot Point
Act Threshold
Emotional Arc

Story Circle

Blueprint 15-beat structure

Loading Story Circle...

Arcplot Score Breakdown

Structural Adherence: Standard
8.9/10
4/10
4/10
Overall Score7.4/10

Weighted: Precision (70%) + Arc (15%) + Theme (15%)

Hollywood Ending (2002) demonstrates carefully calibrated narrative architecture, characteristic of Woody Allen's storytelling approach. This structural analysis examines how the film's 15-point plot structure maps to proven narrative frameworks across 1 hour and 52 minutes. With an Arcplot score of 7.4, the film balances conventional beats with creative variation.

Structural Analysis

The Status Quo at 1 minutes (1% through the runtime) establishes Val Waxman, a once-acclaimed director, is now reduced to directing deodorant commercials, bitter and desperate for respect in Hollywood.. Structural examination shows that this early placement immediately immerses viewers in the story world.

The inciting incident occurs at 14 minutes when Ellie, now engaged to studio executive Hal, proposes that Hal give Val a chance to direct a major studio film in New York, offering Val his comeback opportunity.. At 12% through the film, this Disruption aligns precisely with traditional story structure. This beat shifts the emotional landscape, launching the protagonist into the central conflict.

The First Threshold at 28 minutes marks the transition into Act II, occurring at 25% of the runtime. This indicates the protagonist's commitment to Val actively chooses to accept the directing job, committing to the film despite his pride and anxiety, launching into the world of big-budget filmmaking., moving from reaction to action.

At 55 minutes, the Midpoint arrives at 49% of the runtime—precisely centered, creating perfect narrative symmetry. Significantly, this crucial beat False victory: Despite being blind, Val appears to be successfully directing the film with only his cinematographer knowing the truth, and the footage looks surprisingly good., fundamentally raising what's at risk. The emotional intensity shifts, dividing the narrative into clear before-and-after phases.

The Collapse moment at 83 minutes (74% through) represents the emotional nadir. Here, The film wraps but the studio screening is a disaster - American executives hate the film, declaring it unwatchable and Val's career officially dead., illustrates the protagonist at their lowest point. This beat's placement in the final quarter sets up the climactic reversal.

The Second Threshold at 89 minutes initiates the final act resolution at 80% of the runtime. News arrives that the film is being hailed as a masterpiece at the Cannes Film Festival - the French critics love it, calling it brilliant avant-garde cinema., demonstrating the transformation achieved throughout the journey.

Emotional Journey

Hollywood Ending's emotional architecture traces a deliberate progression across 15 carefully calibrated beats.

Narrative Framework

This structural analysis employs systematic plot point analysis that identifies crucial turning points. By mapping Hollywood Ending against these established plot points, we can identify how Woody Allen utilizes or subverts traditional narrative conventions. The plot point approach reveals not only adherence to structural principles but also creative choices that distinguish Hollywood Ending within the comedy genre.

Woody Allen's Structural Approach

Among the 42 Woody Allen films analyzed on Arcplot, the average structural score is 7.0, demonstrating varied approaches to story architecture. Hollywood Ending represents one of the director's most structurally precise works. For comparative analysis, explore the complete Woody Allen filmography.

Comparative Analysis

Additional comedy films include The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare, The Bad Guys and Lake Placid. For more Woody Allen analyses, see Sleeper, Celebrity and Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Sex *But Were Afraid to Ask.

Plot Points by Act

Act I

Setup
1

Status Quo

1 min1.1%-1 tone

Val Waxman, a once-acclaimed director, is now reduced to directing deodorant commercials, bitter and desperate for respect in Hollywood.

2

Theme

5 min4.5%-1 tone

Val's agent Al discusses how perception is everything in Hollywood - "It's not about reality, it's about what people believe" - establishing the theme of appearance versus reality.

3

Worldbuilding

1 min1.1%-1 tone

Introduction to Val's world: his anxiety-ridden personality, hypochondria, failed marriage to Ellie, strained relationship with his agent, and his desperation to return to prestigious filmmaking.

4

Disruption

14 min12.4%0 tone

Ellie, now engaged to studio executive Hal, proposes that Hal give Val a chance to direct a major studio film in New York, offering Val his comeback opportunity.

5

Resistance

14 min12.4%0 tone

Val debates whether to take the job, wrestling with working for his ex-wife's new fiancé. He consults with Al, visits Ellie, and considers the humiliation versus the opportunity.

Act II

Confrontation
6

First Threshold

28 min24.7%+1 tone

Val actively chooses to accept the directing job, committing to the film despite his pride and anxiety, launching into the world of big-budget filmmaking.

7

Mirror World

33 min29.2%+2 tone

Val reconnects romantically with Ellie during pre-production, establishing the relationship that will reflect the theme of seeing clearly versus being blind to truth.

8

Premise

28 min24.7%+1 tone

Val prepares for and begins filming, but develops psychosomatic blindness on the first day of shooting. He conceals his condition and directs the film while blind, creating absurd situations.

9

Midpoint

55 min49.4%+3 tone

False victory: Despite being blind, Val appears to be successfully directing the film with only his cinematographer knowing the truth, and the footage looks surprisingly good.

10

Opposition

55 min49.4%+3 tone

The production becomes increasingly chaotic. Studio executives grow suspicious, the crew becomes confused by Val's bizarre directing methods, and Hal pressures everyone as the budget balloons.

11

Collapse

83 min74.2%+2 tone

The film wraps but the studio screening is a disaster - American executives hate the film, declaring it unwatchable and Val's career officially dead.

12

Crisis

83 min74.2%+2 tone

Val faces the aftermath of his failure. His sight returns now that filming is over, but his career and relationship with Ellie appear finished. He contemplates his self-destructive patterns.

Act III

Resolution
13

Second Threshold

89 min79.8%+3 tone

News arrives that the film is being hailed as a masterpiece at the Cannes Film Festival - the French critics love it, calling it brilliant avant-garde cinema.

14

Synthesis

89 min79.8%+3 tone

Val travels to Cannes for the triumphant premiere, reconciles with Ellie, and is celebrated as a visionary director. The film becomes an international art-house success.

15

Transformation

111 min98.9%+4 tone

Val is feted at Cannes, acclaimed as a genius. He has succeeded not despite his blindness but because of it, ironically achieving greatness through his limitation. The final image shows him celebrated but aware of the absurdity.