The Worst Person in the World
A modern dramedy about the quest for love and meaning in contemporary Oslo. It chronicles four years in the life of Julie, a young woman who navigates the troubled waters of her love life and struggles to find her career path, leading her to take a realistic look at who she really is.
Despite its modest budget of $5.0M, The Worst Person in the World became a box office success, earning $12.7M worldwide—a 154% return.
Nominated for 2 Oscars. 42 wins & 110 nominations
Plot Structure
Story beats plotted across runtime
Narrative Arc
Emotional journey through the story's key moments
Story Circle
Blueprint 15-beat structure
Arcplot Score Breakdown
Weighted: Precision (70%) + Arc (15%) + Theme (15%)
The Worst Person in the World (2021) reveals deliberately positioned narrative design, characteristic of Joachim Trier's storytelling approach. This structural analysis examines how the film's 15-point plot structure maps to proven narrative frameworks across 2 hours and 8 minutes. With an Arcplot score of 6.4, the film takes an unconventional approach to traditional narrative frameworks.
Structural Analysis
The Status Quo at 1 minutes (1% through the runtime) establishes Julie is introduced as perpetually indecisive, switching from medicine to psychology to photography, unable to commit to a direction in life. She embodies uncertainty and the search for identity.. Of particular interest, this early placement immediately immerses viewers in the story world.
The inciting incident occurs at 16 minutes when Aksel pressures Julie about having children, revealing a fundamental incompatibility. Julie feels trapped and uncertain, recognizing that committing to motherhood means choosing a specific life path she's not sure she wants.. At 12% through the film, this Disruption aligns precisely with traditional story structure. This beat shifts the emotional landscape, launching the protagonist into the central conflict.
The First Threshold at 31 minutes marks the transition into Act II, occurring at 25% of the runtime. This shows the protagonist's commitment to Julie actively chooses to pursue Eivind, kissing him and beginning an emotional affair. This is her decisive break from passive acceptance into active choice, even if it means betraying Aksel., moving from reaction to action.
At 65 minutes, the Midpoint arrives at 51% of the runtime—precisely centered, creating perfect narrative symmetry. Structural examination shows that this crucial beat Julie discovers she's not pregnant after a scare, and her relief reveals her deep ambivalence about motherhood. Simultaneously, Aksel's career faces public controversy. The stakes raise as Julie realizes changing partners hasn't resolved her internal uncertainty., fundamentally raising what's at risk. The emotional intensity shifts, dividing the narrative into clear before-and-after phases.
The Collapse moment at 97 minutes (75% through) represents the emotional nadir. Here, Julie visits dying Aksel in the hospital. He tells her he's afraid of being forgotten. This whiff of death confronts Julie with the ultimate impermanence—her choices matter because time is finite., demonstrates the protagonist at their lowest point. This beat's placement in the final quarter sets up the climactic reversal.
The Second Threshold at 103 minutes initiates the final act resolution at 81% of the runtime. After Aksel's death, Julie gains clarity: there is no perfect choice, only the life you build with the choices you make. She accepts that uncertainty is permanent but paralysis is optional., demonstrating the transformation achieved throughout the journey.
Emotional Journey
The Worst Person in the World's emotional architecture traces a deliberate progression across 15 carefully calibrated beats.
Narrative Framework
This structural analysis employs a 15-point narrative structure framework that maps key story moments. By mapping The Worst Person in the World against these established plot points, we can identify how Joachim Trier utilizes or subverts traditional narrative conventions. The plot point approach reveals not only adherence to structural principles but also creative choices that distinguish The Worst Person in the World within the comedy genre.
Comparative Analysis
Additional comedy films include The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare, The Bad Guys and Lake Placid.
Plot Points by Act
Act I
SetupStatus Quo
Julie is introduced as perpetually indecisive, switching from medicine to psychology to photography, unable to commit to a direction in life. She embodies uncertainty and the search for identity.
Theme
Aksel tells Julie that his generation fought for freedom and choice, and now her generation is paralyzed by too many options. This establishes the film's central theme: the burden of infinite possibility.
Worldbuilding
Julie meets Aksel, a successful comic book artist 15 years her senior. They fall in love and move in together. Her life appears stable but she remains restless, working in a bookstore while still searching for her purpose.
Disruption
Aksel pressures Julie about having children, revealing a fundamental incompatibility. Julie feels trapped and uncertain, recognizing that committing to motherhood means choosing a specific life path she's not sure she wants.
Resistance
Julie struggles with the relationship dynamics. She crashes a wedding party where she meets Eivind, a younger man who represents a different life possibility. She debates whether to stay in her comfortable but unsatisfying relationship.
Act II
ConfrontationFirst Threshold
Julie actively chooses to pursue Eivind, kissing him and beginning an emotional affair. This is her decisive break from passive acceptance into active choice, even if it means betraying Aksel.
Mirror World
Julie and Eivind begin their relationship in earnest. Eivind represents freedom, youth, and postponed responsibility—the thematic counterpoint to Aksel's pressure for commitment and conventional adult life.
Premise
Julie explores her new life with Eivind, feeling liberated and young. She leaves Aksel, moves in with Eivind, and pursues new creative interests. This section delivers the promise of escape and reinvention.
Midpoint
Julie discovers she's not pregnant after a scare, and her relief reveals her deep ambivalence about motherhood. Simultaneously, Aksel's career faces public controversy. The stakes raise as Julie realizes changing partners hasn't resolved her internal uncertainty.
Opposition
Julie's relationship with Eivind begins to sour as she recognizes the same patterns emerging. She remains indecisive about children and career. Meanwhile, Aksel is diagnosed with terminal pancreatic cancer, forcing Julie to confront mortality and consequence.
Collapse
Julie visits dying Aksel in the hospital. He tells her he's afraid of being forgotten. This whiff of death confronts Julie with the ultimate impermanence—her choices matter because time is finite.
Crisis
Julie processes Aksel's impending death and the weight of her choices. She attends his final moments, recognizing that her indecision has caused real harm. She sits with the darkness of lost time and fractured relationships.
Act III
ResolutionSecond Threshold
After Aksel's death, Julie gains clarity: there is no perfect choice, only the life you build with the choices you make. She accepts that uncertainty is permanent but paralysis is optional.
Synthesis
Julie ends her relationship with Eivind and commits to her photography career. She stops waiting for certainty and instead acts despite uncertainty. She attends Aksel's book launch posthumously, honoring his memory while moving forward.
Transformation
Julie works confidently as a photographer on a film set, fully present and engaged in her chosen path. She has transformed from paralyzed by choice to empowered by commitment, accepting imperfection and impermanence.