Dark Waters
A corporate defense attorney takes on an environmental lawsuit against a chemical company that exposes a lengthy history of pollution.
The film struggled financially against its moderate budget of $20.0M, earning $13.6M globally (-32% loss). While initial box office returns were modest, the film has gained appreciation for its unique voice within the biography genre.
Plot Structure
Story beats plotted across runtime
Narrative Arc
Emotional journey through the story's key moments
Story Circle
Blueprint 15-beat structure
Arcplot Score Breakdown
Weighted: Precision (70%) + Arc (15%) + Theme (15%)
Dark Waters (2019) demonstrates strategically placed plot construction, characteristic of Todd Haynes's storytelling approach. This structural analysis examines how the film's 15-point plot structure maps to proven narrative frameworks across 2 hours and 7 minutes. With an Arcplot score of 7.5, the film showcases strong structural fundamentals.
Structural Analysis
The Status Quo at 1 minutes (1% through the runtime) establishes Robert Bilott is a successful corporate defense attorney at Taft Stettinius & Hollister, comfortable in his role defending chemical companies. He's being celebrated for making partner, living a privileged life in Cincinnati.. Of particular interest, this early placement immediately immerses viewers in the story world.
The inciting incident occurs at 15 minutes when Rob visits the Tennant farm and witnesses firsthand the horrific deaths of cattle and contaminated land. The disturbing home video footage of deformed animals makes the abstract case viscerally real and impossible to ignore.. At 12% through the film, this Disruption aligns precisely with traditional story structure. This beat shifts the emotional landscape, launching the protagonist into the central conflict.
The First Threshold at 31 minutes marks the transition into Act II, occurring at 25% of the runtime. This indicates the protagonist's commitment to Rob makes the active choice to file a federal lawsuit against DuPont after they refuse to cooperate. This irreversible decision puts him at odds with his own firm and the corporate establishment he's always served., moving from reaction to action.
At 63 minutes, the Midpoint arrives at 50% of the runtime—precisely centered, creating perfect narrative symmetry. Significantly, this crucial beat Rob discovers the extent of PFOA contamination - it's in the water supply of 70,000 people, and DuPont has known for decades. False defeat: the problem is vastly bigger than one farmer's cattle, and the fight has only just begun., fundamentally raising what's at risk. The emotional intensity shifts, dividing the narrative into clear before-and-after phases.
The Collapse moment at 94 minutes (74% through) represents the emotional nadir. Here, Rob suffers a breakdown - a minor stroke/TIA from stress. He collapses in his office. This "whiff of death" moment shows he's literally sacrificing his life for the case. Wilbur Tennant dies without seeing justice., demonstrates the protagonist at their lowest point. This beat's placement in the final quarter sets up the climactic reversal.
The Second Threshold at 102 minutes initiates the final act resolution at 80% of the runtime. The science panel finally releases findings linking PFOA to six diseases including cancer. This objective validation gives Rob the ammunition he needs. He realizes he must change tactics - turn it into a class action settlement., demonstrating the transformation achieved throughout the journey.
Emotional Journey
Dark Waters's emotional architecture traces a deliberate progression across 15 carefully calibrated beats.
Narrative Framework
This structural analysis employs structural analysis methodology used to understand storytelling architecture. By mapping Dark Waters against these established plot points, we can identify how Todd Haynes utilizes or subverts traditional narrative conventions. The plot point approach reveals not only adherence to structural principles but also creative choices that distinguish Dark Waters within the biography genre.
Todd Haynes's Structural Approach
Among the 4 Todd Haynes films analyzed on Arcplot, the average structural score is 7.0, reflecting strong command of classical structure. Dark Waters represents one of the director's most structurally precise works. For comparative analysis, explore the complete Todd Haynes filmography.
Comparative Analysis
Additional biography films include Lords of Dogtown, Ip Man 2 and A Complete Unknown. For more Todd Haynes analyses, see Far from Heaven, Carol and I'm Not There.
Plot Points by Act
Act I
SetupStatus Quo
Robert Bilott is a successful corporate defense attorney at Taft Stettinius & Hollister, comfortable in his role defending chemical companies. He's being celebrated for making partner, living a privileged life in Cincinnati.
Theme
Wilbur Tennant tells Rob, "They're lying to you." This encapsulates the film's central theme about institutional deception and the difficulty of exposing truth when powerful entities deny reality.
Worldbuilding
Establishment of Rob's world as corporate lawyer, his relationship with his firm, his grandmother's connection to the Tennants, and the initial presentation of Wilbur Tennant's case. We see dying cattle and Tennant's desperation.
Disruption
Rob visits the Tennant farm and witnesses firsthand the horrific deaths of cattle and contaminated land. The disturbing home video footage of deformed animals makes the abstract case viscerally real and impossible to ignore.
Resistance
Rob debates whether to take the case, facing resistance from his firm who has DuPont as a major client. He reluctantly agrees to investigate, initially hoping for a quick resolution. He visits DuPont, still believing in corporate good faith.
Act II
ConfrontationFirst Threshold
Rob makes the active choice to file a federal lawsuit against DuPont after they refuse to cooperate. This irreversible decision puts him at odds with his own firm and the corporate establishment he's always served.
Mirror World
Sarah Bilott expresses concern about the toll the case is taking on their family. Her character represents the personal cost of pursuing truth and provides the emotional/domestic counterpoint to Rob's professional crusade.
Premise
Rob digs through thousands of pages of documents DuPont was forced to provide. He discovers PFOA (C8) and the decades-long coverup. The "legal thriller" promise: one man vs. documents vs. corporation, uncovering the conspiracy piece by piece.
Midpoint
Rob discovers the extent of PFOA contamination - it's in the water supply of 70,000 people, and DuPont has known for decades. False defeat: the problem is vastly bigger than one farmer's cattle, and the fight has only just begun.
Opposition
Years pass as DuPont uses endless legal delays. Rob's health deteriorates from stress, his firm pressures him to drop it, the EPA won't act, and the community turns against him. The science panel takes years to deliver results. Everything gets harder.
Collapse
Rob suffers a breakdown - a minor stroke/TIA from stress. He collapses in his office. This "whiff of death" moment shows he's literally sacrificing his life for the case. Wilbur Tennant dies without seeing justice.
Crisis
Rob recovers in the hospital and faces the darkness - has it all been worth it? Sarah stands by him but we see the toll. He must decide whether to continue the fight or accept defeat and protect what's left of his health and family.
Act III
ResolutionSecond Threshold
The science panel finally releases findings linking PFOA to six diseases including cancer. This objective validation gives Rob the ammunition he needs. He realizes he must change tactics - turn it into a class action settlement.
Synthesis
Rob negotiates the settlement, forcing DuPont to pay for medical monitoring. He gives a speech to the affected community, taking responsibility and committing to continue fighting. The individual cases will proceed. Justice, partial but real.
Transformation
Text reveals Rob continued fighting for years, winning 3,535 cases against DuPont. We see him continuing his work, no longer the comfortable corporate lawyer but a changed man who found his true purpose in fighting for justice despite the cost.