
Good Neighbor Sam
Sam Bissel is a wholesome family man with a loving wife, Min, and two loving daughters. They lead a happy suburban life. The only part of Sam's life that he is not happy about is his job as a lowly cog in the art department of the advertising firm of Burke & Hare. Sam's professional life takes a major turn when he is made executive of the Nurdlinger Dairy account. Simon Nurdlinger is a wholesome family man who wants a wholesome family man with wholesome family ideals heading his account, Sam the only one in Burke & Hare that fits the bill. Sam's home life also takes a major turn when Min's college friend, Janet Lagerlof, moves in next door. Janet stands to inherit $15 million from her grandfather's estate, but the will has a clause that she must be happily married to inherit the money. Janet is technically divorced from Howard Ebbets, and states that getting back with Howard is not worth $15 million. But when Jack Bailey and Irene Krump - two of Janet's relatives who would like to find any excuse to contest the will - come by for an unexpected visit, Janet impetuously introduces Sam as her husband, Howard. Things get more complicated for Sam when he is later forced to introduce Janet as Mrs. Bissel to both Burke and Nurdlinger. Sam and by association Min go along with the ruse, and for their troubles Janet offers to give them $1 million of her inheritance. After that, further complications occur: Janet notices a private investigator snooping around the neighborhood, the P.I. hired by Janet's relatives; Howard, Janet's ex-husband comes back wanting to reconcile with her; and without Sam's knowledge, the Nurdlinger creative includes billboards featuring a wholesome couple espousing the goodness of Nurdlinger milk, that wholesome couple being Sam and Janet as Mr. & Mrs. Sam Bissel. They just have to continue dealing with these complications until the legal hearing. But Min may just have had enough of this plan before they get the money.
The film earned $9.1M at the global box office.
Nominated for 1 BAFTA Award2 nominations
Plot Structure
Story beats plotted across runtime


Narrative Arc
Emotional journey through the story's key moments
Story Circle
Blueprint 15-beat structure
Arcplot Score Breakdown
Weighted: Precision (70%) + Arc (15%) + Theme (15%)
Good Neighbor Sam (1964) exemplifies carefully calibrated dramatic framework, characteristic of David Swift's storytelling approach. This structural analysis examines how the film's 15-point plot structure maps to proven narrative frameworks across 2 hours and 10 minutes. With an Arcplot score of 7.6, the film showcases strong structural fundamentals.
Structural Analysis
The Status Quo at 2 minutes (1% through the runtime) establishes Sam Bissell is established as a happily married, respectable advertising executive living in suburban San Francisco with his wife Minerva and their children. He's a straight-laced, honest man who plays by the rules.. Structural examination shows that this early placement immediately immerses viewers in the story world.
The inciting incident occurs at 16 minutes when Janet reveals that she stands to inherit $15 million from her grandfather's estate, but only if she's still married. Since she's divorced from Howard, she asks Sam to pose as her husband to fool the estate's investigator.. At 12% through the film, this Disruption aligns precisely with traditional story structure. This beat shifts the emotional landscape, launching the protagonist into the central conflict.
The First Threshold at 32 minutes marks the transition into Act II, occurring at 25% of the runtime. This shows the protagonist's commitment to Sam actively agrees to pose as Janet's husband for one evening to fool the estate investigator, Mr. Burke. This decision commits him to the deception and launches the complications of Act 2., moving from reaction to action.
At 66 minutes, the Midpoint arrives at 50% of the runtime—precisely centered, creating perfect narrative symmetry. Structural examination shows that this crucial beat False defeat: Sam's photo with Janet (posing as a married couple) becomes the centerpiece of a major advertising campaign, plastered on billboards across the city. The private deception is now public, raising the stakes dramatically and making it impossible to simply confess., fundamentally raising what's at risk. The emotional intensity shifts, dividing the narrative into clear before-and-after phases.
The Collapse moment at 97 minutes (74% through) represents the emotional nadir. Here, All is lost: The deception unravels completely. Sam's marriage to Minerva is threatened, his reputation is destroyed, he faces losing his job, and the inheritance scheme is exposed. His attempt to be a "good neighbor" has cost him everything he values., demonstrates the protagonist at their lowest point. This beat's placement in the final quarter sets up the climactic reversal.
The Second Threshold at 104 minutes initiates the final act resolution at 80% of the runtime. Sam decides to come clean and tell the complete truth, regardless of consequences. He synthesizes his learned lesson about integrity with his natural problem-solving abilities to resolve the chaos he's created., demonstrating the transformation achieved throughout the journey.
Emotional Journey
Good Neighbor Sam's emotional architecture traces a deliberate progression across 15 carefully calibrated beats.
Narrative Framework
This structural analysis employs a 15-point narrative structure framework that maps key story moments. By mapping Good Neighbor Sam against these established plot points, we can identify how David Swift utilizes or subverts traditional narrative conventions. The plot point approach reveals not only adherence to structural principles but also creative choices that distinguish Good Neighbor Sam within the comedy genre.
David Swift's Structural Approach
Among the 3 David Swift films analyzed on Arcplot, the average structural score is 7.5, reflecting strong command of classical structure. Good Neighbor Sam represents one of the director's most structurally precise works. For comparative analysis, explore the complete David Swift filmography.
Comparative Analysis
Additional comedy films include The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare, The Bad Guys and Lake Placid. For more David Swift analyses, see The Parent Trap, Pollyanna.
Plot Points by Act
Act I
SetupStatus Quo
Sam Bissell is established as a happily married, respectable advertising executive living in suburban San Francisco with his wife Minerva and their children. He's a straight-laced, honest man who plays by the rules.
Theme
A character discusses the importance of appearances versus reality, and how sometimes good intentions require bending the truth. This sets up the film's exploration of morality, honesty, and social expectations.
Worldbuilding
Establishment of Sam's world: his loving marriage to Minerva, his job at the advertising agency, his friendly relationship with neighbors, and the introduction of Janet Lagerlof, the attractive divorcée who moves in next door with her husband Howard.
Disruption
Janet reveals that she stands to inherit $15 million from her grandfather's estate, but only if she's still married. Since she's divorced from Howard, she asks Sam to pose as her husband to fool the estate's investigator.
Resistance
Sam resists the scheme, knowing it's dishonest and could ruin his reputation. Minerva reluctantly agrees to help Janet. Sam debates the ethical implications and risks. The pressure mounts as the investigator's visit approaches.
Act II
ConfrontationFirst Threshold
Sam actively agrees to pose as Janet's husband for one evening to fool the estate investigator, Mr. Burke. This decision commits him to the deception and launches the complications of Act 2.
Mirror World
Sam's relationship with Janet deepens as they rehearse being married. This subplot explores themes of trust, loyalty, and the tension between helping others and maintaining personal integrity.
Premise
The "fun and games" of the fake marriage: Sam and Janet successfully fool the investigator, but complications multiply. Sam's image as "the married man" with Janet gets photographed and used in his advertising campaign, spreading the deception publicly.
Midpoint
False defeat: Sam's photo with Janet (posing as a married couple) becomes the centerpiece of a major advertising campaign, plastered on billboards across the city. The private deception is now public, raising the stakes dramatically and making it impossible to simply confess.
Opposition
The pressure intensifies: suspicious neighbors investigate, Minerva grows increasingly upset, Sam's boss and colleagues have questions, and the investigator Mr. Burke returns with more scrutiny. Every attempt to manage the situation creates new complications.
Collapse
All is lost: The deception unravels completely. Sam's marriage to Minerva is threatened, his reputation is destroyed, he faces losing his job, and the inheritance scheme is exposed. His attempt to be a "good neighbor" has cost him everything he values.
Crisis
Sam confronts the consequences of his choices. He realizes that honesty and integrity matter more than any external reward. He must find a way to make things right with Minerva and restore truth to the situation.
Act III
ResolutionSecond Threshold
Sam decides to come clean and tell the complete truth, regardless of consequences. He synthesizes his learned lesson about integrity with his natural problem-solving abilities to resolve the chaos he's created.
Synthesis
The finale: Sam executes his plan to resolve all complications. He confronts all parties with honesty, works to restore his marriage, and finds a legitimate solution to Janet's inheritance problem. The truth comes out, and the various deceptions are untangled.
Transformation
Final image mirrors the opening but shows transformation: Sam is again the respectable family man, but now with hard-won wisdom about the importance of honesty over appearances. He's reunited with Minerva, his integrity restored, having learned that being a good neighbor doesn't mean compromising his values.




