National Security
Earl Montgomery, a bombastic police academy reject, and Hank Rafferty, a disgraced, mild-mannered cop, can't seem to escape each other. They met on opposite sides of the law during a routine traffic stop that escalated out of control; now as lowly security guards they're thrown together to bust a smuggling operation.
The film earned $50.1M at the global box office.
Plot Structure
Story beats plotted across runtime
Narrative Arc
Emotional journey through the story's key moments
Story Circle
Blueprint 15-beat structure
Arcplot Score Breakdown
Weighted: Precision (70%) + Arc (15%) + Theme (15%)
National Security (2003) reveals deliberately positioned narrative architecture, characteristic of Dennis Dugan's storytelling approach. This structural analysis examines how the film's 15-point plot structure maps to proven narrative frameworks across 1 hour and 29 minutes. With an Arcplot score of 7.6, the film showcases strong structural fundamentals.
Structural Analysis
The Status Quo at 1 minutes (1% through the runtime) establishes Earl Montgomery confidently takes his police academy exam, believing he's destined to become an LAPD officer. Hank Rafferty is an experienced LAPD detective with his partner Charlie.. Notably, this early placement immediately immerses viewers in the story world.
The inciting incident occurs at 11 minutes when Hank encounters Earl trying to get into his own car. A misunderstanding escalates when a bee attacks Hank, and Earl tries to help by swatting at him. The incident is recorded and appears to show Hank beating Earl, leading to Hank's dismissal from the LAPD.. At 12% through the film, this Disruption aligns precisely with traditional story structure. This beat shifts the emotional landscape, launching the protagonist into the central conflict.
The First Threshold at 22 minutes marks the transition into Act II, occurring at 25% of the runtime. This demonstrates the protagonist's commitment to Hank and Earl are forced to work together when they both witness suspicious activity related to the warehouse robberies. Despite their mutual animosity, circumstances thrust them into an unwilling partnership to solve the case., moving from reaction to action.
At 45 minutes, the Midpoint arrives at 50% of the runtime—precisely centered, creating perfect narrative symmetry. Significantly, this crucial beat False defeat: Hank and Earl's investigation leads them into a trap. They are captured or nearly killed by the criminals, and their evidence is compromised. The stakes are raised when they realize how dangerous and connected their enemies are., fundamentally raising what's at risk. The emotional intensity shifts, dividing the narrative into clear before-and-after phases.
The Collapse moment at 66 minutes (74% through) represents the emotional nadir. Here, All seems lost when their final lead is destroyed, they are completely discredited, or they have a major falling out. The partnership appears to be over, and justice for Charlie's death seems impossible. Their prejudices against each other resurface., indicates the protagonist at their lowest point. This beat's placement in the final quarter sets up the climactic reversal.
The Second Threshold at 71 minutes initiates the final act resolution at 80% of the runtime. Earl and Hank reconcile and combine their different skills and perspectives. New evidence or insight reveals the criminals' final plan. They commit to trusting each other and working as true partners., demonstrating the transformation achieved throughout the journey.
Emotional Journey
National Security's emotional architecture traces a deliberate progression across 15 carefully calibrated beats.
Narrative Framework
This structural analysis employs a 15-point narrative structure framework that maps key story moments. By mapping National Security against these established plot points, we can identify how Dennis Dugan utilizes or subverts traditional narrative conventions. The plot point approach reveals not only adherence to structural principles but also creative choices that distinguish National Security within the action genre.
Dennis Dugan's Structural Approach
Among the 12 Dennis Dugan films analyzed on Arcplot, the average structural score is 7.3, reflecting strong command of classical structure. National Security represents one of the director's most structurally precise works. For comparative analysis, explore the complete Dennis Dugan filmography.
Comparative Analysis
Additional action films include The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare, The Bad Guys and Lake Placid. For more Dennis Dugan analyses, see Jack and Jill, Big Daddy and Saving Silverman.
Plot Points by Act
Act I
SetupStatus Quo
Earl Montgomery confidently takes his police academy exam, believing he's destined to become an LAPD officer. Hank Rafferty is an experienced LAPD detective with his partner Charlie.
Theme
Earl's attitude about automatic assumptions and prejudice is established when he fails the police exam. The theme of misjudgment and seeing beyond surface appearances is introduced.
Worldbuilding
Earl fails the police academy exam. Hank and Charlie investigate warehouse robberies involving sophisticated criminals. Earl becomes a security guard. The two worlds are established separately.
Disruption
Hank encounters Earl trying to get into his own car. A misunderstanding escalates when a bee attacks Hank, and Earl tries to help by swatting at him. The incident is recorded and appears to show Hank beating Earl, leading to Hank's dismissal from the LAPD.
Resistance
Hank loses everything - his job, his reputation, and his partner Charlie is killed by the warehouse criminals. Earl graduates security guard training. Both men are in new, unwanted situations. Hank becomes a security guard. They debate their mutual hatred.
Act II
ConfrontationFirst Threshold
Hank and Earl are forced to work together when they both witness suspicious activity related to the warehouse robberies. Despite their mutual animosity, circumstances thrust them into an unwilling partnership to solve the case.
Mirror World
Earl and Hank's forced partnership represents the thematic opposite of their prejudices. Their relationship will test whether people can move beyond first impressions and assumptions.
Premise
The odd-couple dynamic plays out as Earl and Hank investigate the warehouse conspiracy while bickering constantly. Action-comedy set pieces showcase their incompatibility. They gather clues about the criminal organization while fighting each other as much as the bad guys.
Midpoint
False defeat: Hank and Earl's investigation leads them into a trap. They are captured or nearly killed by the criminals, and their evidence is compromised. The stakes are raised when they realize how dangerous and connected their enemies are.
Opposition
The criminals intensify their efforts to stop Earl and Hank. The LAPD doesn't believe them. Their mutual distrust threatens to tear apart any progress they've made. The antagonists seem to be always one step ahead.
Collapse
All seems lost when their final lead is destroyed, they are completely discredited, or they have a major falling out. The partnership appears to be over, and justice for Charlie's death seems impossible. Their prejudices against each other resurface.
Crisis
Earl and Hank separately contemplate their failure. In their dark night, they each realize the other person isn't who they assumed. They process their prejudices and recognize their need for each other.
Act III
ResolutionSecond Threshold
Earl and Hank reconcile and combine their different skills and perspectives. New evidence or insight reveals the criminals' final plan. They commit to trusting each other and working as true partners.
Synthesis
The finale action sequence where Earl and Hank execute their plan, confront the criminals, and prove the conspiracy. They work in perfect sync, their partnership now genuine. They clear Hank's name and get justice for Charlie.
Transformation
Earl and Hank are now true partners and friends, having overcome their prejudices. They stand together as equals, transformed from enemies to brothers-in-arms. The closing image mirrors the opening but shows mutual respect instead of mutual contempt.