For Your Consideration poster
6.8
Arcplot Score
Unverified

For Your Consideration

200686 minPG-13

The possibility of Oscar gold holds the cast and crew of an independent film in its grip after the performance of its virtually unknown, veteran star generates awards buzz.

Revenue$5.5M
Budget$12.0M
Loss
-6.5M
-54%

The film commercial failure against its modest budget of $12.0M, earning $5.5M globally (-54% loss). While initial box office returns were modest, the film has gained appreciation for its unique voice within the comedy genre.

TMDb5.7
Popularity2.0
Where to Watch
Amazon Prime Video with AdsFandango At HomeYouTubeApple TVGoogle Play MoviesAmazon VideoAmazon Prime VideoSpectrum On Demand

Plot Structure

Story beats plotted across runtime

Act ISetupAct IIConfrontationAct IIIResolutionWorldbuilding3Resistance5Premise8Opposition10Crisis12Synthesis14124679111315
Color Timeline
Color timeline
Sound Timeline
Sound timeline
Threshold
Section
Plot Point

Narrative Arc

Emotional journey through the story's key moments

+52-1
0m21m43m64m85m
Plot Point
Act Threshold
Emotional Arc

Story Circle

Blueprint 15-beat structure

Loading Story Circle...

Arcplot Score Breakdown

Structural Adherence: Flexible
8.9/10
2/10
2/10
Overall Score6.8/10

Weighted: Precision (70%) + Arc (15%) + Theme (15%)

For Your Consideration (2006) reveals carefully calibrated narrative design, characteristic of Christopher Guest's storytelling approach. This structural analysis examines how the film's 15-point plot structure maps to proven narrative frameworks across 1 hour and 26 minutes. With an Arcplot score of 6.8, the film balances conventional beats with creative variation.

Structural Analysis

The Status Quo at 1 minutes (1% through the runtime) establishes Opening montage establishes the modest production of "Home for Purim," a low-budget period drama. The cast and crew are professional but resigned to obscurity, working diligently on a film nobody expects to notice.. Structural examination shows that this early placement immediately immerses viewers in the story world.

The inciting incident occurs at 10 minutes when An internet blogger posts a comment suggesting that Marilyn Hack's performance might be "Oscar-worthy." This single piece of buzz disrupts the entire production, introducing the possibility of recognition that none of them expected.. At 12% through the film, this Disruption aligns precisely with traditional story structure. This beat shifts the emotional landscape, launching the protagonist into the central conflict.

The First Threshold at 21 minutes marks the transition into Act II, occurring at 24% of the runtime. This shows the protagonist's commitment to The producers decide to actively pursue the Oscar narrative, changing the film's title from "Home for Purim" to the more commercial "Home for Thanksgiving." The cast actively embraces the awards campaign, marking their choice to enter the world of hype and self-promotion., moving from reaction to action.

At 43 minutes, the Midpoint arrives at 50% of the runtime—precisely centered, creating perfect narrative symmetry. Of particular interest, this crucial beat False victory: The buzz reaches its peak with multiple cast members being discussed for potential nominations. Talk shows, magazine covers, and industry attention suggest they've "made it." However, this is the high point before the fall - the stakes are raised as they've invested everything emotionally., fundamentally raising what's at risk. The emotional intensity shifts, dividing the narrative into clear before-and-after phases.

The Collapse moment at 63 minutes (73% through) represents the emotional nadir. Here, The Oscar nominations are announced and none of the cast receives nominations. Their dreams die in a public, humiliating moment. This is the "whiff of death" - the death of their fantasies, their transformed identities, and their brief moment of perceived importance., demonstrates the protagonist at their lowest point. This beat's placement in the final quarter sets up the climactic reversal.

The Second Threshold at 68 minutes initiates the final act resolution at 79% of the runtime. Synthesis moment: The characters must move forward with their lives and careers, incorporating the lesson that external validation is fleeting and corrupting. They gain perspective (however painful) on the emptiness of the hype they pursued., demonstrating the transformation achieved throughout the journey.

Emotional Journey

For Your Consideration's emotional architecture traces a deliberate progression across 15 carefully calibrated beats.

Narrative Framework

This structural analysis employs a 15-point narrative structure framework that maps key story moments. By mapping For Your Consideration against these established plot points, we can identify how Christopher Guest utilizes or subverts traditional narrative conventions. The plot point approach reveals not only adherence to structural principles but also creative choices that distinguish For Your Consideration within the comedy genre.

Christopher Guest's Structural Approach

Among the 3 Christopher Guest films analyzed on Arcplot, the average structural score is 6.9, demonstrating varied approaches to story architecture. For Your Consideration takes a more unconventional approach compared to the director's typical style. For comparative analysis, explore the complete Christopher Guest filmography.

Comparative Analysis

Additional comedy films include The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare, The Bad Guys and Lake Placid. For more Christopher Guest analyses, see Almost Heroes, A Mighty Wind.

Plot Points by Act

Act I

Setup
1

Status Quo

1 min1.2%0 tone

Opening montage establishes the modest production of "Home for Purim," a low-budget period drama. The cast and crew are professional but resigned to obscurity, working diligently on a film nobody expects to notice.

2

Theme

4 min4.7%0 tone

A crew member or interviewer casually mentions the unpredictable nature of Hollywood success and how "you never know what will catch on." This foreshadows how external validation will corrupt the artistic process.

3

Worldbuilding

1 min1.2%0 tone

Introduction to the ensemble: aging actress Marilyn Hack, pompous actor Victor Allan Miller, insecure Callie Webb, and the various crew members. The film establishes the mundane reality of low-budget filmmaking, the modest aspirations of the cast, and the professional-but-uninspired atmosphere on set.

4

Disruption

10 min11.6%+1 tone

An internet blogger posts a comment suggesting that Marilyn Hack's performance might be "Oscar-worthy." This single piece of buzz disrupts the entire production, introducing the possibility of recognition that none of them expected.

5

Resistance

10 min11.6%+1 tone

The cast and crew debate how to respond to the buzz. Initial skepticism gives way to hope and then obsession. They discuss potential changes to the film, contemplate the reality of awards season, and begin to imagine transformed lives. Publicists and agents get involved.

Act II

Confrontation
6

First Threshold

21 min24.4%+2 tone

The producers decide to actively pursue the Oscar narrative, changing the film's title from "Home for Purim" to the more commercial "Home for Thanksgiving." The cast actively embraces the awards campaign, marking their choice to enter the world of hype and self-promotion.

7

Mirror World

25 min29.1%+3 tone

The publicist and entertainment media ecosystem are introduced as the "mirror world" - they represent the thematic counterpoint to artistic integrity. They embody the superficiality and manipulation that will teach the characters painful lessons about Hollywood validation.

8

Premise

21 min24.4%+2 tone

The "fun and games" of Oscar buzz: media appearances, makeovers, publicity events, and growing celebrity. Marilyn gets cosmetic procedures, Victor becomes increasingly pompous, Callie obsesses over her chances. The film delivers on its premise of satirizing awards-season madness and Hollywood desperation.

9

Midpoint

43 min50.0%+4 tone

False victory: The buzz reaches its peak with multiple cast members being discussed for potential nominations. Talk shows, magazine covers, and industry attention suggest they've "made it." However, this is the high point before the fall - the stakes are raised as they've invested everything emotionally.

10

Opposition

43 min50.0%+4 tone

Reality begins to intrude: the film's quality is questioned, reviews are mixed, other awards contenders emerge, and the initial buzz fades. The characters become increasingly desperate, making poor decisions. Their transformations (cosmetic surgery, personality changes) alienate them from their authentic selves.

11

Collapse

63 min73.3%+3 tone

The Oscar nominations are announced and none of the cast receives nominations. Their dreams die in a public, humiliating moment. This is the "whiff of death" - the death of their fantasies, their transformed identities, and their brief moment of perceived importance.

12

Crisis

63 min73.3%+3 tone

The emotional aftermath: depression, regret, and reckoning with what they've sacrificed. The characters process their losses individually - Marilyn with her altered appearance, Victor with his inflated ego now deflated, Callie with her shattered confidence. Dark night of forced self-reflection.

Act III

Resolution
13

Second Threshold

68 min79.1%+3 tone

Synthesis moment: The characters must move forward with their lives and careers, incorporating the lesson that external validation is fleeting and corrupting. They gain perspective (however painful) on the emptiness of the hype they pursued.

14

Synthesis

68 min79.1%+3 tone

The finale shows the characters attempting to return to normalcy: attending the Oscar ceremony as spectators, taking new small roles, trying to rebuild their careers. The film-within-a-film is released to indifference. They must reconcile their brief fantasy with ongoing reality.

15

Transformation

85 min98.8%+2 tone

Final image mirrors the opening but shows the damage: the characters are back to obscurity but now carry the scars (literal and metaphorical) of their journey. They're working on new projects, but they're diminished rather than elevated. A melancholy transformation showing the cost of chasing validation.