Ford v Ferrari poster
3.1
Arcplot Score
Unverified

Ford v Ferrari

2019152 minPG-13
Director: James Mangold

As Enzo Ferrari's fast Rosso-Corsa racing cars dominate the mid-1960s motorsport world, the American car designer, Carroll Shelby, is forced to retire after winning the demanding 1959 '24 Hours of Le Mans' endurance race. But, before long, an unexpected proposition by the Vice President of Henry Ford's motor company, Lee Iacocca, will offer an opportunity to beat the Italians at their own game. Now, under those pressing circumstances, the British sports car driver and racing engineer, Ken Miles, reluctantly agrees to lend a hand and improve the firm's image, as Ford's race team has less than ninety days to rewrite history. As a result, the non-conformist duo comes up with the mighty Ford GT40 Mk I high-performance racing car. Can Shelby and Miles break Ferrari's streak?

Story Structure
Cultural Context
Revenue$225.5M
Budget$97.6M
Profit
+127.9M
+131%

Despite a significant budget of $97.6M, Ford v Ferrari became a box office success, earning $225.5M worldwide—a 131% return.

Awards

2 Oscars. 26 wins & 86 nominations

Where to Watch
HulufuboTVYouTube TVAmazon VideoApple TVGoogle Play MoviesYouTubeFandango At Home

Plot Structure

Story beats plotted across runtime

Act ISetupAct IIConfrontationAct IIIResolutionWorldbuilding3Resistance5Premise8Opposition10Crisis12Synthesis14124679111315
Color Timeline
Color timeline
Sound Timeline
Sound timeline
Threshold
Section
Plot Point

Narrative Arc

Emotional journey through the story's key moments

+42-1
0m34m67m101m134m
Plot Point
Act Threshold
Emotional Arc

Story Circle

Blueprint 15-beat structure

Loading Story Circle...

Arcplot Score Breakdown

Structural Adherence: Experimental
2.4/10
7.5/10
2/10
Overall Score3.1/10

Weighted: Precision (70%) + Arc (15%) + Theme (15%)

Ford v Ferrari (2019) exhibits carefully calibrated narrative architecture, characteristic of James Mangold's storytelling approach. This structural analysis examines how the film's 15-point plot structure maps to proven narrative frameworks across 2 hours and 32 minutes. With an Arcplot score of 3.1, the film takes an unconventional approach to traditional narrative frameworks.

Structural Analysis

The Status Quo at 1 minutes (1% through the runtime) establishes Ken Miles races his modified Aston Martin at Willow Springs, pushing the car to its limits. He's a brilliant driver and mechanic living on the edge, barely making ends meet with his small garage while caring for his wife Molly and son Peter.. Notably, this early placement immediately immerses viewers in the story world.

The inciting incident occurs at 16 minutes when Henry Ford II authorizes the purchase of Ferrari after Iacocca's pitch. This sets in motion Ford's audacious plan to beat Ferrari at Le Mans, which will eventually draw both Shelby and Miles into the mission. The disruption is positive - an opportunity emerges.. At 10% through the film, this Disruption aligns precisely with traditional story structure. This beat shifts the emotional landscape, launching the protagonist into the central conflict.

The First Threshold at 34 minutes marks the transition into Act II, occurring at 22% of the runtime. This reveals the protagonist's commitment to Shelby commits to Ford's Le Mans program, accepting the challenge and the corporate constraints that come with it. He actively chooses to enter this new world of corporate racing, leaving behind his independent operation. He also insists on hiring Ken Miles as lead driver despite Ford's objections., moving from reaction to action.

At 68 minutes, the Midpoint arrives at 45% of the runtime—arriving early, accelerating into Act IIb complications. The analysis reveals that this crucial beat At the 1965 Le Mans race, all three Ford GT40s catastrophically fail and retire. Ferrari wins again. This is a false defeat - the public humiliation is devastating, but it teaches Shelby and Miles exactly what they need to fix. The stakes raise: Ford nearly kills the program, but gives them one more year., fundamentally raising what's at risk. The emotional intensity shifts, dividing the narrative into clear before-and-after phases.

The Collapse moment at 101 minutes (66% through) represents the emotional nadir. Here, During the 1966 Le Mans race, with Miles dominating and on track to win, Leo Beebe orders Shelby to have Miles slow down so all three Ford cars can cross the finish line together for a photo finish. Shelby, devastated, must betray his driver. Miles, furious but loyal, complies. Due to a technicality, Miles is placed second despite the tie. The victory is stolen. The dream of perfect achievement dies - corporate interests kill the art., illustrates the protagonist at their lowest point. This beat's placement in the final quarter sets up the climactic reversal.

The Second Threshold at 108 minutes initiates the final act resolution at 71% of the runtime. Ken Miles accepts an offer to test the new J-car prototype for Shelby. Despite the Le Mans betrayal, Miles chooses to continue pursuing perfection. He synthesizes the lesson: the achievement is in the driving, not the recognition. He and Shelby plan the next evolution. The friendship endures beyond corporate politics., demonstrating the transformation achieved throughout the journey.

Emotional Journey

Ford v Ferrari's emotional architecture traces a deliberate progression across 15 carefully calibrated beats.

Narrative Framework

This structural analysis employs a 15-point narrative structure framework that maps key story moments. By mapping Ford v Ferrari against these established plot points, we can identify how James Mangold utilizes or subverts traditional narrative conventions. The plot point approach reveals not only adherence to structural principles but also creative choices that distinguish Ford v Ferrari within the action genre.

James Mangold's Structural Approach

Among the 9 James Mangold films analyzed on Arcplot, the average structural score is 6.5, demonstrating varied approaches to story architecture. Ford v Ferrari takes a more unconventional approach compared to the director's typical style. For comparative analysis, explore the complete James Mangold filmography.

Comparative Analysis

Additional action films include The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare, The Bad Guys and Lake Placid. For more James Mangold analyses, see 3:10 to Yuma, Logan and Cop Land.

Plot Points by Act

Act I

Setup
1

Status Quo

1 min0.7%0 tone

Ken Miles races his modified Aston Martin at Willow Springs, pushing the car to its limits. He's a brilliant driver and mechanic living on the edge, barely making ends meet with his small garage while caring for his wife Molly and son Peter.

2

Theme

6 min4.1%0 tone

Carroll Shelby tells the story of his 1959 Le Mans victory to a crowd: "There's a point at 7,000 RPM where everything fades. The machine becomes weightless. It disappears. All that's left is a body moving through space and time. 7,000 RPM. That's where you meet it. That's where it waits for you." The theme: perfection exists at the edge of what's possible, where man and machine become one.

3

Worldbuilding

1 min0.7%0 tone

Establish the world of 1960s racing. Shelby has retired from driving due to a heart condition and now builds cars. Miles struggles financially despite his talent. Ford Motor Company is losing market share to younger buyers. Ferrari dominates Le Mans. Lee Iacocca pitches Henry Ford II on racing to change Ford's image.

4

Disruption

16 min11.6%+1 tone

Henry Ford II authorizes the purchase of Ferrari after Iacocca's pitch. This sets in motion Ford's audacious plan to beat Ferrari at Le Mans, which will eventually draw both Shelby and Miles into the mission. The disruption is positive - an opportunity emerges.

5

Resistance

16 min11.6%+1 tone

Ford executives travel to Maranello to negotiate buying Ferrari. Enzo Ferrari humiliates Henry Ford II, calling Ford cars and the man himself inferior. The deal collapses. A furious Ford II declares war: Ford will build a race car to destroy Ferrari at Le Mans. Shelby is recruited. Miles faces financial crisis when the bank forecloses on his garage.

Act II

Confrontation
6

First Threshold

34 min24.7%+2 tone

Shelby commits to Ford's Le Mans program, accepting the challenge and the corporate constraints that come with it. He actively chooses to enter this new world of corporate racing, leaving behind his independent operation. He also insists on hiring Ken Miles as lead driver despite Ford's objections.

7

Mirror World

39 min28.8%+3 tone

Shelby takes Miles out in a GT40 prototype for a test drive. Their partnership solidifies - two perfectionists who understand what it takes to achieve 7,000 RPM, where man and machine transcend limitations. Miles is the driver who can realize Shelby's vision. This relationship carries the film's thematic heart: the bond between artists pursuing perfection against corporate bureaucracy.

8

Premise

34 min24.7%+2 tone

The promise of the premise: building and testing the GT40 to beat Ferrari. Shelby and Miles work obsessively on the car. Miles pushes every limit, providing crucial feedback. Conflicts with Ford executive Leo Beebe intensify - he sees Miles as unmarketable and dangerous. The team tests at Willow Springs, Riverside. Ford II pressures Shelby. The car breaks down repeatedly but improves.

9

Midpoint

68 min50.0%+2 tone

At the 1965 Le Mans race, all three Ford GT40s catastrophically fail and retire. Ferrari wins again. This is a false defeat - the public humiliation is devastating, but it teaches Shelby and Miles exactly what they need to fix. The stakes raise: Ford nearly kills the program, but gives them one more year.

10

Opposition

68 min50.0%+2 tone

Pressure intensifies from all sides. Shelby and Miles redesign the GT40 Mark II. They dominate at Daytona 1966 with Miles driving, proving the car works. But Leo Beebe convinces Ford II that Miles is too volatile for Le Mans - he's replaced with a safer driver. Shelby fights back, taking Ford II for a terrifying ride that makes him cry and vomit. Ford II overrules Beebe and puts Miles in the Le Mans lineup. But Beebe isn't done scheming.

11

Collapse

101 min74.0%+1 tone

During the 1966 Le Mans race, with Miles dominating and on track to win, Leo Beebe orders Shelby to have Miles slow down so all three Ford cars can cross the finish line together for a photo finish. Shelby, devastated, must betray his driver. Miles, furious but loyal, complies. Due to a technicality, Miles is placed second despite the tie. The victory is stolen. The dream of perfect achievement dies - corporate interests kill the art.

12

Crisis

101 min74.0%+1 tone

The aftermath of Le Mans. Miles is gutted but gracious. Shelby is furious at the injustice. Ford celebrates the photo finish as marketing genius. Miles and Shelby share a quiet moment of understanding - they achieved perfection on the track even if the result was corrupted. Miles reflects on what matters: the 7,000 RPM moment, not the trophy.

Act III

Resolution
13

Second Threshold

108 min79.5%+1 tone

Ken Miles accepts an offer to test the new J-car prototype for Shelby. Despite the Le Mans betrayal, Miles chooses to continue pursuing perfection. He synthesizes the lesson: the achievement is in the driving, not the recognition. He and Shelby plan the next evolution. The friendship endures beyond corporate politics.

14

Synthesis

108 min79.5%+1 tone

Miles tests the J-car at Willow Springs with Shelby watching. He pushes the car to its absolute limits, finding that transcendent 7,000 RPM space. Peter watches his father do what he was born to do. The car suffers a catastrophic mechanical failure at high speed. Miles is killed in the crash. Shelby is shattered.

15

Transformation

134 min98.6%0 tone

Shelby visits Molly and Peter Miles after the funeral. He gives Peter the wrench Ken had taken from their first race together - a symbol of their bond. Shelby and Peter work on Ken's Cobra in the garage, continuing his legacy. The closing image mirrors the opening: a driver and machine pushing to the limit. But now we understand the cost and meaning of that pursuit. Transformation is bittersweet: they proved they could achieve perfection, but the artist is gone.