On the Basis of Sex
The true story of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, her struggles for equal rights, and the early cases of a historic career that lead to her nomination and confirmation as U.S. Supreme Court Associate Justice.
Working with a respectable budget of $20.0M, the film achieved a modest success with $38.8M in global revenue (+94% profit margin).
4 wins & 12 nominations
Plot Structure
Story beats plotted across runtime
Narrative Arc
Emotional journey through the story's key moments
Story Circle
Blueprint 15-beat structure
Arcplot Score Breakdown
Weighted: Precision (70%) + Arc (15%) + Theme (15%)
On the Basis of Sex (2018) exemplifies strategically placed narrative architecture, characteristic of Mimi Leder's storytelling approach. This structural analysis examines how the film's 15-point plot structure maps to proven narrative frameworks across 2 hours. With an Arcplot score of 7.6, the film showcases strong structural fundamentals.
Structural Analysis
The Status Quo at 1 minutes (1% through the runtime) establishes Ruth Bader Ginsburg arrives at Harvard Law School in 1956, one of only nine women in a class of over 500 men, establishing her as an outsider in a male-dominated world.. Significantly, this early placement immediately immerses viewers in the story world.
The inciting incident occurs at 14 minutes when Ruth cannot find employment despite her stellar credentials. Every law firm rejects her because she is a woman, forcing her to accept a teaching position at Rutgers where she faces continued discrimination and lower pay.. At 12% through the film, this Disruption aligns precisely with traditional story structure. This beat shifts the emotional landscape, launching the protagonist into the central conflict.
The First Threshold at 30 minutes marks the transition into Act II, occurring at 25% of the runtime. This reveals the protagonist's commitment to Ruth decides to take on Charles Moritz's tax case, actively choosing to challenge gender discrimination in federal court. This decision commits her to direct legal combat against the system., moving from reaction to action.
At 60 minutes, the Midpoint arrives at 50% of the runtime—precisely centered, creating perfect narrative symmetry. The analysis reveals that this crucial beat The ACLU leader Mel Wulf attempts to take over Ruth's case, dismissing her work and threatening to argue it himself. This false defeat raises the stakes: Ruth must fight her own allies to maintain control of her strategy., fundamentally raising what's at risk. The emotional intensity shifts, dividing the narrative into clear before-and-after phases.
The Collapse moment at 90 minutes (75% through) represents the emotional nadir. Here, Ruth struggles during oral arguments, failing to effectively counter the government's attacks. She appears to lose the case, and her dream of changing the law through this vehicle seems to die. The judges seem unconvinced., indicates the protagonist at their lowest point. This beat's placement in the final quarter sets up the climactic reversal.
The Second Threshold at 95 minutes initiates the final act resolution at 79% of the runtime. Ruth finds her voice and conviction, realizing she must make her closing argument with passion and moral clarity. She synthesizes her legal expertise with her personal experience of discrimination, seeing that the law must reflect equality, not tradition., demonstrating the transformation achieved throughout the journey.
Emotional Journey
On the Basis of Sex's emotional architecture traces a deliberate progression across 15 carefully calibrated beats.
Narrative Framework
This structural analysis employs structural analysis methodology used to understand storytelling architecture. By mapping On the Basis of Sex against these established plot points, we can identify how Mimi Leder utilizes or subverts traditional narrative conventions. The plot point approach reveals not only adherence to structural principles but also creative choices that distinguish On the Basis of Sex within the biography genre.
Mimi Leder's Structural Approach
Among the 3 Mimi Leder films analyzed on Arcplot, the average structural score is 7.1, reflecting strong command of classical structure. On the Basis of Sex represents one of the director's most structurally precise works. For comparative analysis, explore the complete Mimi Leder filmography.
Comparative Analysis
Additional biography films include Lords of Dogtown, Ip Man 2 and A Complete Unknown. For more Mimi Leder analyses, see Pay It Forward, The Peacemaker.
Plot Points by Act
Act I
SetupStatus Quo
Ruth Bader Ginsburg arrives at Harvard Law School in 1956, one of only nine women in a class of over 500 men, establishing her as an outsider in a male-dominated world.
Theme
At a dinner, Dean Griswold asks the women to justify taking a spot from a qualified man. The theme of systemic gender discrimination and the need to prove women's equal worth is stated.
Worldbuilding
Establishment of Ruth's world at Harvard: managing motherhood, attending classes for her husband Marty during his cancer treatment, facing institutional sexism, and graduating despite obstacles. Shows her brilliance and determination, but also the barriers she faces.
Disruption
Ruth cannot find employment despite her stellar credentials. Every law firm rejects her because she is a woman, forcing her to accept a teaching position at Rutgers where she faces continued discrimination and lower pay.
Resistance
Ruth teaches at Rutgers, joins the ACLU, and debates with students about gender discrimination cases. Marty encourages her to find a test case. She resists taking aggressive action, preferring incremental academic work, uncertain she can create real change.
Act II
ConfrontationFirst Threshold
Ruth decides to take on Charles Moritz's tax case, actively choosing to challenge gender discrimination in federal court. This decision commits her to direct legal combat against the system.
Mirror World
Ruth meets Charles Moritz, a man denied a tax deduction for caring for his mother because the law assumes only women are caregivers. He represents the thematic mirror: discrimination harms everyone when based on gender stereotypes.
Premise
Ruth and Marty build their case, researching precedents and crafting arguments. Ruth experiences the promise of the premise: becoming a courtroom advocate, working alongside her husband as equal partners, and directly confronting the discriminatory legal system.
Midpoint
The ACLU leader Mel Wulf attempts to take over Ruth's case, dismissing her work and threatening to argue it himself. This false defeat raises the stakes: Ruth must fight her own allies to maintain control of her strategy.
Opposition
Ruth faces mounting opposition: conflict with the ACLU, hostile questioning from judges during oral arguments, attacks on her credibility, and media scrutiny. Her approach is challenged, her marriage strained, and her daughter Jane rebels. The pressure intensifies from all sides.
Collapse
Ruth struggles during oral arguments, failing to effectively counter the government's attacks. She appears to lose the case, and her dream of changing the law through this vehicle seems to die. The judges seem unconvinced.
Crisis
Ruth processes her apparent failure, doubting her strategy and herself. She retreats emotionally, facing the possibility that her approach was wrong and that she has failed Charles, the movement, and her own principles.
Act III
ResolutionSecond Threshold
Ruth finds her voice and conviction, realizing she must make her closing argument with passion and moral clarity. She synthesizes her legal expertise with her personal experience of discrimination, seeing that the law must reflect equality, not tradition.
Synthesis
Ruth delivers a powerful closing statement about how gender discrimination is embedded in hundreds of laws. The court rules in her favor. She celebrates with Marty and her team, then prepares for the larger battles ahead, having established precedent.
Transformation
Ruth walks up the steps of the Supreme Court as Justice Ginsburg, transformed from rejected job applicant to Supreme Court Justice. The closing text reveals her legacy: she won five of six cases before the court and changed the landscape of gender equality law.